4.7 Article

Discussion on requirements of gasifier gas tightness for underground coal gasification production

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101550

Keywords

Underground coal gasification; Underground coal gasifier; Gas tightness

Funding

  1. Shandong Natural Science Foundation [ZR2020ME084]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51504142]
  3. Qingchuang Science and Technology Program of Shandong Province University [2019KJG008]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Shandong University of Science and Technology for Recruited Talents [2017RCJJ013]
  5. SDUST Research Fund [2018TDJH102]
  6. Geological Survey Project of China Geological Survey [DD20190182]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

UCG technology, an innovative coal mining method, has not yet been widely applied due to complex geological conditions and control issues. The importance of gas tightness control in UCG and the challenges in maintaining it were discussed in this paper.
Underground coal gasification (UCG) technology is an innovative coal in-situ chemical combustion mining method. Affected by complex geological conditions and poor controllability, UCG has not yet realized large-scale industrial application. The gas tightness control of UCG is an important factor to ensure its safe production, but there are deficiencies in its research at this stage. In the process of UCG, complex physical and chemical changes will occur in the overburden of the gasifier under high temperature, resulting in thermal damage and fracture development of the overburden, which makes it difficult for the underground gasifier to maintain good gas tightness. In this paper, the important significance of gas tightness to underground gasifier, the influencing factors of gas tightness and how to detect and maintain gas tightness were discussed, and some suggestions were also put forward on how to reduce gas leakage and improve gas tightness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available