Journal
ENERGY REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 5475-5482Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.08.131
Keywords
Energy efficiency rebound (REC); Energy consumption intensity; Coal industry; Energy conservation; Comparative analysis
Categories
Funding
- Shandong Province Social Science Planning Project [21CPYJ22]
- QinXin Talents Cultivation Program of Beijing Information Science and Technology University [QXTCPC201907]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Economic growth relies on growth in energy consumption, which has led to carbon emissions. The study found rebound effects in energy intensity at both industry and enterprise levels, with a significant difference due to variations in energy consumption statistics. Therefore, it is suggested that coal consumption as raw material should not be defined as energy consumption at the enterprise level, and recommendations for energy efficiency improvements are provided based on practical evidence.
Economic growth largely requires the support of growth in energy consumption and has also caused many carbon emissions. China is one of the few energy producers and consumers dominated by coal in the world. The rebound in coal energy efficiency will affect the country's energy security and carbon neutrality by 2060. Therefore, this article initially defines the energy efficiency rebound effect of the coal industry and compares the rebound effect coefficient (REC) at the coal industry level and the enterprise (YK Group) level. The study found that energy intensity at the macro and micro levels has been downward, but with a rebound effect; at the industry level, the REC in the last 20 years was 30.27%, while at the enterprise level is 3.03%. The main reason for the huge gap is the difference in energy consumption statistics at different levels. Finally, this article proposes that coal consumption as raw material should not be defined as energy consumption at the enterprise level. It gives suggestions for energy efficiency improvement at the enterprise level according to the practice. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available