4.6 Article

Mycobacterium microti at the Environment and Wildlife Interface

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9102084

Keywords

Mycobacterium microti; Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex; environmental samples; rodents

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health Italy [PRC2014013/E88F15000140001]
  2. Fondazione Edmund Mach

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study indicates that wild rodents, particularly Apodemus sylvaticus, Microtus sp., and Apodemus flavicollis, may play essential roles in the maintenance of Mycobacterium microti infections in wild boar by ingestion or contact with infected excreta or contaminated environments at animal aggregation sites.
An unexpected high presence of Mycobacterium microti in wild boar in Northern Italy (Garda Lake) has been reported since 2003, but the factors contributing to the maintenance of this pathogen are still unclear. In this study, we investigated the presence of M. microti in wild rodents and in water and soil samples collected at wild boar aggregation areas, such as watering holes, with the aim of clarifying their role in M. microti transmission. In total, 8 out of 120 captured animals tested positive for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) as assessed by real-time PCR, and six samples were confirmed to be M. microti. A strain with a genetic profile similar to those previously isolated in wild boars in the same area was isolated from one sample. Of the 20 water and 19 mud samples, 3 and 1, respectively, tested positive for the presence of MTBC, and spacer oligotype SB0118 (vole type) was detected in one sample. Our study suggests that wild rodents, in particular Apodemus sylvaticus, Microtus sp. and Apodemus flavicollis, play roles in the maintenance of M. microti infections in wild boar through ingestion or by contact with either infected excreta or a contaminated environment, such as at animal aggregation sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available