4.6 Article

Comparison of Diplodia Tip Blight Pathogens in Spanish and North American Pine Ecosystems

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9122565

Keywords

Sphaeropsis sapinea; Diplodia tip blight; dieback; SSRs; Diplodia scrobiculata

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diplodia tip blight is a common and severe disease in Spanish Pinus radiata plantations, requiring management designs tailored to different regions. Diplodia sapinea was found to be the most frequent species in plantations in northern Spain, demonstrating high genetic diversity. The intensity of sampling and sample type may influence genetic diversity levels.
Diplodia tip blight is the most ubiquitous and abundant disease in Spanish Pinus radiata plantations. The economic losses in forest stands can be very severe because of its abundance in cones and seeds together with the low genetic diversity of the host. Pinus resinosa is not genetically diverse in North America either, and Diplodia shoot blight is a common disease. Disease control may require management designs to be adapted for each region. The genetic diversity of the pathogen could be an indicator of its virulence and spreading capacity. Our objective was to understand the diversity of Diplodia spp. in Spanish plantations and to compare it with the structure of American populations to collaborate in future management guidelines. Genotypic diversity was investigated using microsatellite markers. Eight loci (SS9-SS16) were polymorphic for the 322 isolates genotyped. The results indicate that Diplodia sapinea is the most frequent Diplodia species present in plantations of the north of Spain and has high genetic diversity. The higher genetic diversity recorded in Spain in comparison to previous studies could be influenced by the intensity of the sampling and the evidence about the remarkable influence of the sample type.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available