4.5 Article

Exploring personality characteristics of Chinese adolescents with internet-related addictive behaviors: Trait differences for gaming addiction and social networking addiction

Journal

ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 32-35

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.039

Keywords

Addictive behavior; Adolescents; Internet addiction; Gaming addiction; Personality; Social networking

Funding

  1. Small Project Funding of The University of Hong Kong [201209176147]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the associations between personality traits, based on the Big Five model, and addictive behaviors to different online activities among adolescents. A sample of 920 participants was recruited from four secondary schools in different districts using random cluster sampling. A structured questionnaire, including demographic information, internet usage pattern, the Internet Addiction Test, the Game Addiction Scale, the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale - Revised, and the Big Five Inventory, was administered to each participant. The results demonstrated a significant difference in personality traits for addictive behaviors related to different online activities. Specifically, higher neuroticism (beta = 0.15, p < 0.001) and less conscientiousness (beta = 0.12, p < 0.001) displayed significant associations with internet addiction in general; less conscientiousness (beta = 0.09, p < 0.01) and low openness (A = 0.06, p < 0.05) were significantly associated with gaming addiction; and neuroticism beta = 0.15, p < 0.001) and extraversion (beta = 0.10, p < 0.01) were significantly associated with social networking addiction. Our findings may provide a better understanding of the etiopathology of internet-related addictive behaviors and have implications for psychoeducation and psychotherapy programs. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available