4.7 Review

Oxidative Stress and Diseases Associated with High-Altitude Exposure

Journal

ANTIOXIDANTS
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox11020267

Keywords

oxidative stress; high altitude; pulmonary hypertension; reactive oxygen species; altitude diseases

Funding

  1. GORE-FIC TARAPACA [BIP30477541-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exposure to high altitude can lead to various diseases, and the development of these diseases is related to oxidative stress. Antioxidant treatments show promise in mitigating high-altitude pathologies.
Several diseases associated with high-altitude exposure affect unacclimated individuals. These diseases include acute mountain sickness (AMS), high-altitude cerebral edema (HACE), high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE), chronic mountain sickness (CMS), and, notably, high-altitude pulmonary hypertension (HAPH), which can eventually lead to right ventricle hypertrophy and heart failure. The development of these pathologies involves different molecules and molecular pathways that might be related to oxidative stress. Studies have shown that acute, intermittent, and chronic exposure to hypobaric hypoxia induce oxidative stress, causing alterations to molecular pathways and cellular components (lipids, proteins, and DNA). Therefore, the aim of this review is to discuss the oxidative molecules and pathways involved in the development of high-altitude diseases. In summary, all high-altitude pathologies are related to oxidative stress, as indicated by increases in the malondialdehyde (MDA) biomarker and decreases in superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) antioxidant activity. In addition, in CMS, the levels of 8-iso-PGF2 alpha and H2O2 are increased, and evidence strongly indicates an increase in Nox4 activity in HAPH. Therefore, antioxidant treatments seem to be a promising approach to mitigating high-altitude pathologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available