4.7 Review

Pathophysiology and Therapeutics of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm in Marfan Syndrome

Journal

BIOMOLECULES
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom12010128

Keywords

angiotensin II; arterial disease; endothelial dysfunction; Marfan syndrome; NO signaling; oxidative stress; TGF beta; thoracic aortic aneurysm

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL126173, AR069307, HL134605]
  2. Marfan Foundation
  3. Elster's family Research Endowment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article describes a series of studies on Marfan syndrome that have implicated endothelial dysfunction and improper angiotensin II and TGF beta signaling in driving thoracic aortic disease in Marfan syndrome mice. These investigations have influenced the conceptualization of possible new therapies to slow down or even halt aneurysm progression in this relatively common connective tissue disorder.
About 20% of individuals afflicted with thoracic aortic disease have single-gene mutations that predispose the vessel to aneurysm formation and/or acute aortic dissection often without associated syndromic features. One widely studied exception is Marfan syndrome (MFS) in which mutations in the extracellular protein fibrillin-1 cause additional abnormalities in the heart, eyes, and skeleton. Mouse models of MFS have been instrumental in delineating major cellular and molecular determinants of thoracic aortic disease. In spite of research efforts, translating experimental findings from MFS mice into effective drug therapies for MFS patients remains an unfulfilled promise. Here, we describe a series of studies that have implicated endothelial dysfunction and improper angiotensin II and TGF beta signaling in driving thoracic aortic disease in MFS mice. We also discuss how these investigations have influenced the way we conceptualized possible new therapies to slow down or even halt aneurysm progression in this relatively common connective tissue disorder.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available