4.7 Review

Non-Antibody-Based Binders for the Enrichment of Proteins for Analysis by Mass Spectrometry

Journal

BIOMOLECULES
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom11121791

Keywords

mass spectrometry; affimer; antibody; phage display; protein analysis

Funding

  1. European Commission (H2020 MSCA-ITN 2017 Analytics for Biologics) [765502]
  2. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [765502] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the applications of non-antibody-based binders in enriching proteins for LC-MS analysis, comparing them to antibodies and introducing methods for binder immobilization. While the combination of non-antibody-based binders with targeted mass spectrometry shows promise in certain areas, the limited commercial availability of these binders poses a bottleneck that needs to be addressed.
There is often a need to isolate proteins from body fluids, such as plasma or serum, prior to further analysis with (targeted) mass spectrometry. Although immunoglobulin or antibody-based binders have been successful in this regard, they possess certain disadvantages, which stimulated the development and validation of alternative, non-antibody-based binders. These binders are based on different protein scaffolds and are often selected and optimized using phage or other display technologies. This review focuses on several non-antibody-based binders in the context of enriching proteins for subsequent liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis and compares them to antibodies. In addition, we give a brief introduction to approaches for the immobilization of binders. The combination of non-antibody-based binders and targeted mass spectrometry is promising in areas, like regulated bioanalysis of therapeutic proteins or the quantification of biomarkers. However, the rather limited commercial availability of these binders presents a bottleneck that needs to be addressed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available