4.6 Article

Adaptive Event-Triggered Asynchronous Control for Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Markov Jump Systems With Cyberattacks

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCNS.2022.3141025

Keywords

Adaptive event-triggered mechanism (AETM); dissipative asynchronous control; hidden Markov model (HMM); interval type-2 (IT2) fuzzy systems; Markov jump systems (MJSs)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12150008, 61973100, 61876050, 61903290]
  2. China Scholarship Council [202006120100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the problem of adaptive event-triggered dissipative control for interval type-2 fuzzy nonlinear Markov jump systems subject to asynchronous switching and cyberattacks. An adaptive event-triggered mechanism (AETM) is introduced to fully utilize the limited network resources and alleviate the pressure of network communication. The proposed algorithm is validated by two examples.
In this article, the problem of adaptive event-triggered dissipative control is investigated for interval type-2 (IT2) fuzzy nonlinear Markov jump systems subject to asynchronous switching and cyberattacks. To reduce unnecessary transmission, an adaptive event-triggered mechanism (AETM) is introduced to fully employ the limited network resources and alleviate the pressure of network communication. The considered cyberattacks are described by a stochastic function with stochastic distribution. Then, a novel IT2 fuzzy closed-loop system is efficiently built under the AETM and the cyberattacks model, in which the asynchronous phenomenon of the plant and controller are described by the hidden Markov model. By utilizing the Lyapunov stability approach, sufficient conditions are established for the IT2 fuzzy closed-loop systems with strictly dissipative performance. Two examples are given to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available