4.5 Article

Clinical significance and applications of oscillometry

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW
Volume 31, Issue 163, Pages -

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0208-2021

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The publication of technical standards for respiratory oscillometry has a significant impact on the medical field. Oscillometry has wide applications in airway resistance, bronchodilator responsiveness, medical therapy, and has unique advantages in specific situations. Despite the great potential as a clinical tool, more clinical evidence is needed to support its routine use in diagnosing and monitoring respiratory diseases.
Recently, Technical standards for respiratory oscillometry was published, which reviewed the physiological basis of oscillometric measures and detailed the technical factors related to equipment and test performance, quality assurance and reporting of results. Here we present a review of the clinical significance and applications of oscillometry. We briefly review the physiological principles of oscillometry and the basics of oscillometry interpretation, and then describe what is currently known about oscillometry in its role as a sensitive measure of airway resistance, bronchodilator responsiveness and bronchial challenge testing, and response to medical therapy, particularly in asthma and COPD. The technique may have unique advantages in situations where spirometry and other lung function tests are not suitable, such as in infants, neuromuscular disease, sleep apnoea and critical care. Other potential applications include detection of bronchiolitis obliterans, vocal cord dysfunction and the effects of environmental exposures. However, despite great promise as a useful clinical tool, we identify a number of areas in which more evidence of clinical utility is needed before oscillometry becomes routinely used for diagnosing or monitoring respiratory disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available