4.7 Article

Pleiotropic Effects of Simvastatin and Losartan in Preclinical Models of Post-Traumatic Elbow Contracture

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.803403

Keywords

post-traumatic joint contracture; rat elbow; gel contraction; simvastatin; losartan

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH R01 AR071444, NIH P30 AR074992]
  2. Alafi Neuroimaging Laboratory
  3. Hope Center for Neurological Disorders
  4. NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant [NIH S10 RR027552]
  5. DePuy
  6. Arthrex
  7. Wright Medical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In two preclinical models of elbow post-traumatic joint contracture, simvastatin (SV) may be a suitable prophylactic drug therapy, while losartan (LS) does not have the same effect. These findings provide initial insight for future studies aimed at preventing or mitigating elbow post-traumatic joint contracture.
Elbow trauma can lead to post-traumatic joint contracture (PTJC), which is characterized by loss of motion associated with capsule/ligament fibrosis and cartilage damage. Unfortunately, current therapies are often unsuccessful or cause complications. This study aimed to determine the effects of prophylactically administered simvastatin (SV) and losartan (LS) in two preclinical models of elbow PTJC: an in vivo elbow-specific rat injury model and an in vitro collagen gel contraction assay. The in vivo elbow rat (n = 3-10/group) injury model evaluated the effects of orally administered SV and LS at two dosing strategies [i.e., low dose/high frequency/short duration (D1) vs. high dose/low frequency/long duration (D2)] on post-mortem elbow range of motion (via biomechanical testing) as well as capsule fibrosis and cartilage damage (via histopathology). The in vitro gel contraction assay coupled with live/dead staining (n = 3-19/group) evaluated the effects of SV and LS at various concentrations (i.e., 1, 10, 100 mu M) and durations (i.e., continuous, short, or delayed) on the contractibility and viability of fibroblasts/myofibroblasts [i.e., NIH3T3 fibroblasts with endogenous transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF beta 1)]. In vivo, no drug strategy prevented elbow contracture biomechanically. Histologically, only SV-D2 modestly reduced capsule fibrosis but maintained elevated cellularity and tissue hypertrophy, and both SV strategies lessened cartilage damage. SV modest benefits were localized to the anterior region, not the posterior, of the joint. Neither LS strategy had meaningful benefits in capsule nor cartilage. In vitro, irrespective of the presence of TGF beta 1, SV (>= 10 mu M) prevented gel contraction partly by decreasing cell viability (100 mu M). In contrast, LS did not prevent gel contraction or affect cell viability. This study demonstrates that SV, but not LS, might be suitable prophylactic drug therapy in two preclinical models of elbow PTJC. Results provide initial insight to guide future preclinical studies aimed at preventing or mitigating elbow PTJC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available