4.7 Article

Glucose-Derived Raspberry Ketone Produced via Engineered Escherichia coli Metabolism

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.843843

Keywords

raspberry ketone; flavor agent; microbial production; plant secondary metabolite; metabolic engieering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully produced raspberry ketone (RK) from simple carbon sources by genetically engineering the metabolism of Escherichia coli. The engineered E. coli produced high amounts of metabolic precursors and used overexpression of specific enzymes to increase RK production. The production system is inexpensive and does not rely on plant extraction, making it a significant contribution to the flavor and fragrance industries.
The demand for raspberry ketone (RK) as a plant-based natural flavoring agent is high, but natural RK is one of the most expensive flavor compounds due to its limited content in plants. Here, we produced RK de novo from simple carbon sources in Escherichia coli. We genetically engineered E. coli metabolism to overproduce the metabolic precursors tyrosine and p-coumaric acid and increase RK production. The engineered E. coli produced 19.3- and 1.9 g/L of tyrosine and p-coumaric acid from glucose, respectively. The p-coumaric acid CoA ligase from Agrobacterium tumefaciens and amino acid substituted benzalacetone synthase of Rhemu palmatum (Chinese rhubarb) were overexpressed in E. coli overproducing p-coumaric acid. The overexpression of fabF, encoding beta-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthetase II increased intracellular malonyl-CoA, the precursor of benzalacetone synthase for RK biosynthesis, and improved RK production. Fed-batch cultures given glucose as a carbon source produced 62 mg/L of RK under optimized conditions. Our production system is inexpensive and does not rely on plant extraction; thus, it should significantly contribute to the flavor and fragrance industries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available