4.7 Review

Matrix Vesicles as a Therapeutic Target for Vascular Calcification

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.825622

Keywords

vascular calcification; matrix vesicles; extracellular vesicles; exosomes; vascular smooth muscle cells

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11932014, 31971239]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vascular calcification is associated with increased risk of heart disease, stroke, and atherosclerotic plaque rupture. Extracellular vesicles, particularly matrix vesicles, play a crucial role in the early stages of vascular calcification. However, the underlying mechanism by which matrix vesicles drive vascular smooth muscle cells phenotype switching and calcification remains unclear.
Vascular calcification (VC) is linked to an increased risk of heart disease, stroke, and atherosclerotic plaque rupture. It is a cell-active process regulated by vascular cells rather than pure passive calcium (Ca) deposition. In recent years, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have attracted extensive attention because of their essential role in the process of VC. Matrix vesicles (MVs), one type of EVs, are especially critical in extracellular matrix mineralization and the early stages of the development of VC. Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) have the potential to undergo phenotypic transformation and to serve as a nucleation site for hydroxyapatite crystals upon extracellular stimulation. However, it is not clear what underlying mechanism that MVs drive the VSMCs phenotype switching and to result in calcification. This article aims to review the detailed role of MVs in the progression of VC and compare the difference with other major drivers of calcification, including aging, uremia, mechanical stress, oxidative stress, and inflammation. We will also bring attention to the novel findings in the isolation and characterization of MVs, and the therapeutic application of MVs in VC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available