4.7 Article

Blocking hyaluronan synthesis alleviates acute lung allograft rejection

Journal

JCI INSIGHT
Volume 6, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.142217

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 HL130275]
  2. HMS/BCH CENTER FOR NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, an NINDS P30 Core Center grant [NS072030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that using 4-Methylumbelliferone (4MU) can alleviate acute allograft rejection in a murine model of lung transplantation, significantly improving transplant outcomes by reducing T cell-mediated lung inflammation, LMW-HA content, and pathology scores. Additionally, in vitro experiments showed that 4MU directly attenuated the activation, proliferation, and differentiation of naive CD4(+) T cells into Th1 cells. Given the safety of 4MU for human use, further research on its potential treatment for acute lung allograft rejection may have clinical significance.
Lung allograft rejection results in the accumulation of low-molecular weight hyaluronic acid (LMW-HA), which further propagates inflammation and tissue injury. We have previously shown that therapeutic lymphangiogenesis in a murine model of lung allograft rejection reduced tissue LMW-HA and was associated with improved transplant outcomes. Herein, we investigated the use of 4-Methylumbelliferone (4MU), a known inhibitor of HA synthesis, to alleviate acute allograft rejection in a murine model of lung transplantation. We found that treating mice with 4MU from days 20 to 30 after transplant was sufficient to significantly improve outcomes, characterized by a reduction in T cell-mediated lung inflammation and LMW-HA content and in improved pathology scores. In vitro, 4MU directly attenuated activation, proliferation, and differentiation of naive CD4(+) T cells into Th1 cells. As 4MU has already been demonstrated to be safe for human use, we believe examining 4MU for the treatment of acute lung allograft rejection may be of clinical significance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available