4.7 Article

Influence of erbium addition on the defects of selective laser-melted 7075 aluminium alloy

Journal

VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 406-418

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2021.1990358

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; selective laser melting; 7075 aluminium alloy; crack; erbium

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M672131, 2021M690493]
  2. Shandong Natural Science Foundation [ZR2020QE030, ZR2020QE169, ZR2020ME164]
  3. Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province [ts20190401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study on Er-modified 7075 aluminum alloy showed that the addition of Er can reduce crack density but increase porosity, with Er existing in the form of unmelted particles and sub-micrometer scale Al3Er. The deterioration of fluidity in the molten pool due to Er particles leads to higher porosity, while the coherency between aluminum matrix and Al3Er favors grain refinement and crack reduction.
Selective laser-melted (SLMed) 7075 aluminium alloy is prone to cracking. Erbium (Er) could modify the aluminium alloys to prevent cracking in traditional manufacturing processes. In the present study, Er-modified 7075 aluminium alloy powders are prepared to investigate the influence of Er element on crack reduction in SLM. The evolution of Er is characterised by a scanning electron microscope (SEM), a X-ray diffraction (XRD) and high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM). The results show that the crack density is reduced with Er addition, but the porosity increases, a new discovery. Based on the SEM and TEM results, Er addition exists in the form of unmelted particles and Al3Er of sub-micrometer scale. The Er particles in the molten pool deteriorate the fluidity and result in higher porosity. The coherency between aluminium matrix and Al3Er favours the grain refinement, therefore the crack reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available