4.8 Review

A decade retrospective of medical robotics research from 2010 to 2020

Journal

SCIENCE ROBOTICS
Volume 6, Issue 60, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.abi8017

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01NS099207, R01HL124020]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020B_185039]
  3. ERC [743217]
  4. National Science Foundation [2025130]
  5. TIRR Foundation [018-114]
  6. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [20DZ2220400]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020B_185039] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  8. Directorate For Engineering
  9. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [2025130] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Robotics is a forward-looking discipline, and this article reviews the eight key research themes in medical robotics over the past decade, hoping to foster an entrepreneurial spirit in researchers to reduce the widening gap between research and translation.
Robotics is a forward-looking discipline. Attention is focused on identifying the next grand challenges. In an applied field such as medical robotics, however, it is important to plan the future based on a clear understanding of what the research community has recently accomplished and where this work stands with respect to clinical needs and commercialization. This Review article identifies and analyzes the eight key research themes in medical robotics over the past decade. These thematic areas were identified using search criteria that identified the most highly cited papers of the decade. Our goal for this Review article is to provide an accessible way for readers to quickly appreciate some of the most exciting accomplishments in medical robotics over the past decade; for this reason, we have focused only on a small number of seminal papers in each thematic area. We hope that this article serves to foster an entrepreneurial spirit in researchers to reduce the widening gap between research and translation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available