4.3 Article

Structural and electronic properties of nonconventional α-graphyne nanocarbons

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.016001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CAPES
  2. Brazilian agency CNPq [429785/2018-6, 310394/2020-1]
  3. CENAPAD-UFC at Universidade Federal do Ceara
  4. PROCAD 2013/CAPES program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a set of nonconventional graphyne lattices inspired by sp(2) nanocarbon sheets, known as haeckelites, is proposed and their electronic properties are investigated using density functional theory methods. These lattices exhibit stability and metallic nature, but differ significantly from the original haeckelites in terms of electronic properties.
In this work, we propose a set of nonconventional graphyne lattices inspired by previously studied sp(2) nanocarbon sheets, known as haeckelites, and we study their electronic properties by density functional theory methods. Two of these systems are solely composed of five- and seven-membered rings in rectangular lattices, while a third system features a mixture of five-, six-, and seven-polygonal rings in a hexagonal network. We show that these systems exhibit dynamical, thermal, and mechanical stability as demonstrated by phonon band structures, molecular dynamics simulations, and by the computation of their elastic constants. The three lattices exhibit a metallic nature similar to their full-sp(2) counterparts. However, the graphynes' electronic properties are strongly different from those of the original haeckelites, as the largest contribution to their frontier states comes from the sp hybridized atoms. Furthermore, the three proposed systems feature different electronic signatures from each other, as their frontier states feature different energy ranges for forbidden electronic states, and one of them features a set of Dirac-like cones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available