4.4 Article

An exomoon survey of 70 cool giant exoplanets and the new candidate Kepler-1708 b-i

Journal

NATURE ASTRONOMY
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages 367-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41550-021-01539-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA [80NSSC21K0960]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [948467]
  3. NASA High-End Computing (HEC) Program through the NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS) Division at Ames Research Center [HEC-SMD-17-1386]
  4. NASA Science Mission Directorate
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [948467] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exomoons are an important missing puzzle piece in our understanding of extrasolar planetary systems. We conducted a survey of 70 cool, giant transiting exoplanet candidates found by Kepler, and found only one showing a moon-like signal. The planet is a statistically validated Jupiter-sized planet orbiting a Sun-like star.
Exomoons represent a crucial missing puzzle piece in our efforts to understand extrasolar planetary systems. To address this deficiency, we here describe an exomoon survey of 70 cool, giant transiting exoplanet candidates found by Kepler. We identify only one exhibiting a moon-like signal that passes a battery of vetting tests: Kepler-1708 b. We show that Kepler-1708 b is a statistically validated Jupiter-sized planet orbiting a Sun-like quiescent star at 1.6 au. The signal of the exomoon candidate, Kepler-1708 b-i, is a 4.8 sigma effect and is persistent across different instrumental detrending methods, with a 1% false-positive probability via injection-recovery. Kepler-1708 b-i is similar to 2.6 Earth radii and is located in an approximately coplanar orbit at similar to 12 planetary radii from its similar to 1.6 au Jupiter-sized host. Future observations will be necessary to validate or reject the candidate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available