4.5 Article

Assessment of biomass briquette energy potential from agricultural residues in Cameroon

Journal

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-022-02388-2

Keywords

Biomass briquettes; Agricultural residues; Energy potential; Briquetting conversion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biomass briquettes made from agricultural residues should be recommended for household cooking in countries with high agricultural potential. This paper evaluates the energy recoverable from crop residues by briquette manufacturing and analyzes the benefits and barriers of briquetting conversion in Cameroon. The results show that the availability of agricultural residues in the country provides an important potential for briquette production, with an annual energy potential of around 106 PJ.
Biomass briquettes made from agricultural residues should be strongly recommended for household cooking in countries with high agricultural potential like Cameroon. This paper aims to evaluate the energy recoverable from crop residues by briquette manufacturing and to analyze the benefits and barriers of briquetting conversion of these residues in the country. Agricultural residues considered in this investigation are generated by rice, banana/plantain, maize, groundnut, cotton, coconut, sugarcane, palm oil, coffee, and cocoa. The residues generated by these crops are husks, shells, bagasse, leaves, peels, stalks, straw, and stems. The estimation was done using the Residues-to-Product Ratio method, and the results show that the annual crop residues production is 46,236,156 tons. The briquetting conversion of these residues could produce 7,706,260 tons of biomass briquettes with an annual energy potential of around 106 PJ year(-1). It is concluded that the availability of agricultural residues in that country provides an important potential for briquette production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available