4.5 Article

Production of solid hydrochar from waste seaweed by hydrothermal carbonization: effect of process variables

Journal

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-022-02365-9

Keywords

Waste seaweed; Thermochemical conversion; Hydrochar; Biochemical; Biomass

Funding

  1. Research and Development Program of Ghent University Global Campus (GUGC), Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the properties of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) char produced from two different species of waste seaweed. The results show that an increase in residence time and HTC temperature can increase the surface area of the char, but decrease the yield. The Sargassum-based char exhibits high methylene blue adsorption capacity under specific conditions.
This study provides a comparison of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) char, starting from two different species of waste seaweed, namely the green algae Ulva pertusa and the brown algae Sargassum horneri. The effect of reaction temperature (180 similar to 250 celcius), biomass residence time (1 similar to 6 h), and water mass ratio (1 similar to 10) on HTC yield (38 similar to 57%) was investigated. Surface area (5 similar to 52 m(2) g(-1)), methylene blue removal efficiency (71 similar to 99%), methylene blue adsorption capacity (11 similar to 88%), and hydrochar composition have been assessed. An increasing residence time and HTC temperature led to an increase in surface area up to a maximum of 51 m(2) g(-1), while the yield in HTC hydrochar decreased around 35% for both HC. The van Krevelen diagram was extended to compare the variation in elemental composition of the waste seaweed derived hydrochars. Results of the methylene blue adsorption experiments are best described by a Langmuir model with maximal adsorption capacity values of 112 +/- 7.63 mg g(-1) for the Sargassum based char, produced at 180 degrees C celcius, with water/biomass ratio of 5 and 4 h residence time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available