4.5 Article

Ultrasonic supported oil extraction, process modeling, and optimization by response surface methodology tool from Croton Macrostachyus leaf

Journal

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-022-02357-9

Keywords

Croton macrostachyus leaf; Oil extraction; Response surface methodology; Optimization; Ultrasound-assisted

Funding

  1. Jimma Institute of Technology Center of Excellence-CRGE RESOURCE CART (Climate Resilient Green Economy Resource Centre for Advanced Research and Training-Linking Energy with Water and Agriculture)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) was used to extract Croton macrostachyus leaf oil. The influence of different factors on the oil yield was investigated, and the optimal conditions for extraction were determined. The findings suggest that Croton macrostachyus leaf oil can be a promising alternative source of oil and biodiesel feedstock.
The present study, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) was used to extract Croton macrostachyus leaf oil, which enhances the rate of reaction and temperature in a shorter length of time while also ensuring the highest oil recovery. Through response surface methodology (RSM), the influence of sonication temperature (35-45 degrees C), sonication time (25-35 min), ultrasound power (250-550 W), and percentage of solid-to-solvent ratio (10-20%) on the oil yield was investigated. The optimal conditions of Croton macrostachyus leaf oil were found to be 42 degrees C of temperature, 30.61 min of sonication time, 425.79 W of ultrasound power, and 18% (w/v) of solid to solvent. Under these circumstances, the optimum extraction efficiency of oil was found as 38.63% with a desirability value of 1.00. In general, these findings suggest that Croton macrostachyus leaf can be explored as a promising alternative source of oil and new biodiesel feedstock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available