4.3 Article

Characterization and comparison of key aroma-active compounds of cocoa liquors from five different areas

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD PROPERTIES
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages 2396-2408

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2016.1238929

Keywords

Cocoa liquor; Direct solvent extraction-solvent assisted flavor evaporation (DSE-SAFE); Purge and trap (P&T) extraction; Gas chromatography-olfactometry-mass spectrometry (GC-O-MS); Aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The volatile constituents of cocoa liquor and the differences between cocoa liquors from different origins were studied. Direct solvent extraction-solvent assisted flavor evaporation and gas chromatography-olfactrometry-mass spectrometry in conjunction with aroma extract dilution analysis were used to identify the key flavor compounds in five cocoa liquors. There were significant differences of specific compounds between cocoa liquor from different areas of origins. Then, the purge and trap method was used to gathering the aroma-active components of five cocoa liquors from different origins, and one internal standard was used during this process for the further quantitative analysis by gas chromatography-olfactrometry-mass spectrometry. The results indicated that 3-methylbutanal, acetic acid, tetramethylpyrazine, and 3-methylbutanoic acid were the components with high concentrations. The contents of most compounds in the five kinds of cocoa liquor were dramatically different. The content of odorants of cocoa liquors from Papua New Guinea was higher than that of the others and that from Indonesia was the lowest. For sensory evaluation, the overall odor outlines of the five cocoa liquors were very similar, the Papua New Guinea cocoa liquor had higher preference than those of the other four samples. Principal component analysis showed that the characteristics of cocoa liquor from Papua New Guinea, Indonesia, and Ivory Coast were very significant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available