4.7 Article

Response of Pear Trees' (Pyrus bretschneideri 'Sinkiangensis') Fine Roots to a Soil Water Regime of Regulated Deficit Irrigation

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11112316

Keywords

pear tree; root length density; tree growth; yield

Funding

  1. Presidential Foundation of the Beijing Academy of Forestry and Pomology Sciences [201902]
  2. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2007BAD38B00]
  3. China National Natural Science Fund [50879087]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed the impact of moderate water stress on fine root length density of mature pear trees, with recovery and improved fruit yield in the SRDI-1 treatment during the fruit enlargement stage. Moderate water stress applied during different stages did not significantly affect fruit yield.
A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) on the fine root redistribution of mature pear trees in 2009 and 2010. The experiment consisted of four RDI treatments: MRDI-1 and SRDI-1, in which the trees received irrigation replacing 60% and 40% of pan evaporation (Ep) during Stage 1 (cell division stage), and MRDI-1+2 and SRDI-1+2, in which the trees received irrigation replacing 60% and 40% of Ep during Stage 1+2 (cell division and slow shoot growth stage). All the RDI-treated trees received irrigation replacing 80% of Ep (full irrigation) in other stages, and the control trees were fully irrigated during the whole growth season. The results showed that the fine root length density (RLD) of mature pear trees was reduced by water stress. The resumption of full irrigation boosted fine root growth. The RLD of the SRDI-1-treated trees in the irrigated zones recovered in early July, they maintained water and nutrient absorption during the fruit enlargement stage, and the final fruit yield was significantly improved. The RLD of trees in the irrigated zones with MRDI-1 and MRDI-1+2 recovered in July and September, respectively, but there were no significant differences in fruit yield between the MRDI-1, MRDI-1+2, and the control. This indicates that the fruit yield was not negatively or positively impacted by the redistribution of moderate water stress applied during either Stage 1 or Stage 1+2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available