4.7 Article

Comparison of Droplet Deposition, 28-Homobrassinolide Dosage Efficacy and Working Efficiency of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Knapsack Manual Sprayer in the Maize Field

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12020385

Keywords

28-Homobrassinolide; unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV); Knapsack Manual Sprayer (KMS); droplets deposition distribution; grain filling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effects of different sprayers and dosages of brassinolides on maize yield and other growth parameters. The results showed that using a UAV sprayer and appropriate dosage of brassinolides can significantly increase yield and photosynthetic parameters.
Brassinolides (BRs) are naturally-occurring phytohormones, which are essentially important to improve the crop adoptive capacity to various stresses. Spray volume (SV) and agrochemical application methods are associated with chemical deposition and field efficiency. The objective of this study was to compare the possible effects of 28-Homobrassinolide (HBL) dosages 18, 22, and 30 mg a.i. ha(-1) for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayers (15 L ha(-1) and 30 L ha(-1)) and 22 mg a.i. ha(-1) for Knapsack manual sprayers (KMS) (450 L ha(-1)) at maize silking stage on droplets deposition distribution, photosynthetic parameters, grain filling process and yield. The results showed that the droplet deposition of UAV (15, 30 L ha(-1)) was 47.04%, 8.89% higher than KMS. However, the UAV sprayer had a poor droplet deposition distribution. HBL significantly increased the photosynthetic parameters, grain filling rate, and yield. A UAV spray volume of 15 L ha(-1) with 22 mg a.i. ha(-1) significantly increased grains yield by 4.16-5.64%, 7.5-12.09% compared to KMS and CK in both years. Considering the high efficiency of the UAV sprayer and better effects of HBL on final yield, spraying 22~30 mg a.i. ha(-1) with UAV spray volume 15 L ha(-1) at the silking stage could be a better strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available