4.7 Article

Mapping Online Geographical Indication: Agri-Food Markets on E-Retail Shelves

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11122385

Keywords

geographical indication; field theory; market construction; e-retail; agri-food market; economic sociology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the market for agri-food products with GI between the EU and Mercosur, showing the formation of significant brands in the GI market and the decisive role of supermarkets' own brands in market construction.
Economics has been trying to understand market functioning for a long time. However, the neoclassical approach does not satisfy the understanding of the mechanisms that operate in the construction, stabilization, and transformation of markets. For this reason, economic sociology proposes to provide subsidies from causal pluralism, rejecting explanatory theories of purely rational choices. Therefore, the use of sociological theories in the understanding of agri-food markets is also necessary. In this sense, this work aimed to compare the market for agri-food products with a geographical indication (GI) between the European Union (EU) and Mercosur, based on the performance of brands and supermarkets in both regions. For this, we used a data survey of thousands of products and respective GI registrations in the most prominent online markets of countries in both regions. We applied analyses that differentiated the economic blocs and used field theory to explain the phenomena found in the findings. The results indicated the formation of relevant bands in the GI market, a little voluminous, but capable of crossing borders, a second, with the majority of GIs found that are only commercialized locally, and a third invisible, where most products are located, which do not exist in these markets. Furthermore, supermarkets' own brands have great relevance and are decisive in building the market.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available