4.5 Article

Passion fruit seed extract protects beta-amyloid-induced neuronal cell death in a differentiated human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell model

Journal

FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 1461-1468

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2757

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; functional food; neurite fragmentation; neuronal cell death; passion fruit seed extract; piceatannol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that piceatannol-rich passion fruit seed extract can suppress neuronal cell death in an Alzheimer's disease cell model by protecting against neurite fragmentation. Passion fruit seed extract and piceatannol have the potential to be neuroprotective functional foods for the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with accompanying perceptive disorder. We previously reported that decreasing levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BONE) promoted beta-amyloid (Ap)-induced neuronal cell death in neuron-like differentiated SH-SY5Y (ndSH-SY5Y) human neuroblastoma cells in an AD mimic cell model. We investigated the neuroprotective effects of passion fruit seed extract (PFSE) and one of the main stilbene compounds, piceatannol, in an AD cell model using ndSH-SY5Y cells. Both PFSE and piceatannol were found to protect Ap-induced neurite fragmentation in the cell model (protection efficacy; 34% in PFSE and 36% in piceatannol). In addition, both PFSE and piceatannol suppress Ap-induced neuronal cell death in the cell model (inhibitory effect; 27% in PFSE and 32% in piceatannol). Our study is the first to report that piceatannol-rich PFSE can repress Ap-induced neuronal cell death by protecting against neurite fragmentation in the AD human cell model. These findings suggest that piceatannol-rich PFSE can be considered a potentially neuroprotective functional food for both prevention and treatment of AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available