4.5 Article

Can relational governance improve sustainability in public-private partnership infrastructure projects? An empirical study based on structural equation modeling

Journal

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-04-2021-0333

Keywords

Public-private partnership; Relational governance; Sustainability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research investigates the impact of relational governance on the sustainability of PPP infrastructure projects and finds that public involvement plays a moderating role in this relationship. Furthermore, the study reveals that managerial innovation acts as a mediator between relational governance and the sustainability of PPP infrastructure projects.
Purpose According to relational contract theory, relational governance has potential to improve public-private partnership (PPP) infrastructure project sustainability. The main purpose of this research is to investigate the association between relational governance and the sustainability of PPP infrastructure projects. Further, this study examines the mediating effect of managerial innovation and the moderating role of public involvement. Design/methodology/approach Research data were collected from 158 valid questionnaires completed by Chinese PPP professionals. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was then employed to test five hypotheses. Findings Results indicate a positive correlation between relational governance and PPP infrastructure project sustainability. This linkage is regulated by public involvement. In addition, managerial innovation plays a mediating role between relational governance and the sustainability of PPP infrastructure projects. Originality/value This study verifies the relationship between relational governance and PPP infrastructure project sustainability, as well as intermediary and regulatory factors, providing a new approach to achieving sustainability in PPP infrastructure projects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available