4.7 Article

Identification of risk factors for Campylobacter contamination levels on broiler carcasses during the slaughter process

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 226, Issue -, Pages 26-32

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.03.010

Keywords

Campylobacter; Risk factors; Quantification; Slaughterhouse; Poultry

Funding

  1. Belgian Federal Public Service of Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment [RF 11/6241 CAMPYTRACE]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Campylobacter carcass contamination was quantified across the slaughter line during processing of Campylobacter positive batches. These quantitative data were combined together with information describing slaughterhouse and batch related characteristics in order to identify risk factors for Campylobacter contamination levels on broiler carcasses. The results revealed that Campylobacter counts are influenced by the contamination of incoming birds (both the initial external carcass contamination and the colonization level of caeca) and the duration of transport and holding time that can be linked with feed withdrawal period. In addition, technical aspects of the slaughter process such as a dump based unloading system, electrical stunning, lower scalding temperature, incorrect setting of plucking, vent cutter and evisceration machines were identified as risk factors associated with increased Campylobacter counts on processed carcasses. As such the study indicates possible improvements of the slaughter process that can result in better control of Campylobacter numbers under routine processing of Campylobacter positive batches without use of chemical or physical decontamination. Moreover, all investigated factors were existing variations of the routine processing practises and therefore proposed interventions are practically and economically achievable. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available