4.7 Article

Settle Down! Ranging Behaviour Responses of Roe Deer to Different Capture and Release Methods

Journal

ANIMALS
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani11113299

Keywords

box trap; Capreolus capreolus; net drives; net trap; roe deer; 3R's

Funding

  1. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
  2. Marie-Claire Cronstedts Stiftelse
  3. Swedish Infrastructure for Ecosystem Science (SITES)
  4. Mov-It ANR project [ANR-16-CE02-0010-02]
  5. Autonomous Province of Trento
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-16-CE02-0010] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studying animal movement in the wild is crucial for ecosystem relationships and conservation efforts. Capturing and handling animals for fitting tracking devices can cause behavioral modifications, but wild species have shown resilience to such events, quickly recovering to average behavior. Researchers are encouraged to adapt methods to minimize stress and prioritize animal welfare in research.
Simple Summary The study of animal movement in wild, free ranging species is fundamental for advancing knowledge on ecosystem relationships and for conservation. The deployment of bio-logging devices to this purpose (often GPS-collars in large mammals) requires relatively invasive procedures, such as capture, handling and release. Capture and manipulation cause behavioural modifications that are largely understudied in wild species and may affect both the welfare of animals and the output of the studies. We evaluated post capture and release ranging behaviour responses of a small deer species (roe deer Capreolus capreolus) for five different capture methods across 14 study sites within the EURODEER collaborative project. Roe deer showed modifications in their movement behaviour, independently of the capture method. However, individuals recovered rapidly, converging towards the average behaviour within a relatively short interval of time (between 10 days and one month), demonstrating a general resilience to such stressful events. We encourage researchers to continually adapt capture and handling methods so as to minimize stress and prioritize animal welfare. The fitting of tracking devices to wild animals requires capture and handling which causes stress and can potentially cause injury, behavioural modifications that can affect animal welfare and the output of research. We evaluated post capture and release ranging behaviour responses of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) for five different capture methods. We analysed the distance from the centre of gravity and between successive locations, using data from 14 different study sites within the EURODEER collaborative project. Independently of the capture method, we observed a shorter distance between successive locations and contextual shift away from the home range centre of gravity after the capture and release event. However, individuals converged towards the average behaviour within a relatively short space of time (between 10 days and one month). If researchers investigate questions based on the distance between successive locations of the home range, we recommend (1) initial investigation to establish when the animals start to behave normally again or (2) not using the first two to three weeks of data for their analysis. We also encourage researchers to continually adapt methods to minimize stress and prioritize animal welfare wherever possible, according to the Refinement of the Three R's.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available