4.4 Article

Deliberative democracy and environmental justice: evaluating the role of citizens' juries in urban climate governance

Journal

LOCAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages 1512-1531

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2021.1990235

Keywords

Just transitions; citizens' juries; deliberative democracy; climate emergency; climate governance; public participation

Funding

  1. UK Economic and Social Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding mechanisms of policy engagement and the participation of different actors in urban climate governance is crucial for ensuring that inequalities are not exacerbated by climate action. Citizens' juries can serve as a valuable deliberative democracy tool in this context, helping to achieve representation justice in decision-making spaces through careful consideration of power differentials and the facilitation of participatory parity.
Understanding mechanisms of policy engagement and the participation of different actors in urban climate governance is particularly important as cities follow climate emergency declarations with corresponding action, to ensure that inequalities are not exacerbated by climate action. Citizens' juries are a deliberative democracy tool that allows a demographically representative sample of the population to learn about a contested issue from experts, and discuss, debate and develop policy recommendations. Leeds City Council declared a climate emergency in March 2019, compelling the local authority to take serious measures to implement a reduction in carbon emissions to net zero by 2030. A citizens' jury was established by an independent local body, the Leeds Climate Commission, to debate various possible courses of action in response to the declaration. This research critically examined the processes surrounding and embedded in the Leeds citizens' climate jury with a focus on procedural justice and representation justice. Emerging lessons include that recognition of power differentials between various social groups should be carefully considered throughout deliberative processes to ensure representation justice is achieved in decision making. Representation justice demands that those who are included in decision making spaces are able to harness their position to voice their experiences, opinions, hopes and concerns in deciding which trade-offs will be made. In citizens' juries, facilitation style and techniques play a critical role in achieving this participatory parity, alongside other factors. There is potential for important procedural co-benefits to emerge, such as trust-building, place identity and hope for the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available