4.6 Article

Methodology to Differentiate Legume Species in Intercropping Agroecosystems Based on UAV with RGB Camera

Journal

ELECTRONICS
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics11040609

Keywords

chickpea; lentil; ervil; vegetation index; drone; remote sensing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a preliminary method for differentiating between chickpea, lentil, and ervil in an intercropping agroecosystem using images taken with a drone and the combination of Vegetation Index and Soil Index. The results indicate that it is possible to differentiate between the three crops, with the highest accuracy achieved for chickpea recognition.
Mixed crops are one of the fundamental pillars of agroecological practices. Row intercropping is one of the mixed cropping options based on the combination of two or more species to reduce their impacts. Nonetheless, from a monitoring perspective, the coexistence of different species with different characteristics complicates some processes, requiring a series of adaptations. This article presents the initial development of a procedure that differentiates between chickpea, lentil, and ervil in an intercropping agroecosystem. The images have been taken with a drone at the height of 12 and 16 m and include the three crops in the same photograph. The Vegetation Index and Soil Index are used and combined. After generating the index, aggregation techniques are used to minimize false positives and false negatives. Our results indicate that it is possible to differentiate between the three crops, with the difference between the chickpea and the other two legume species clearer than that between the lentil and the ervil in images gathered at 16 m. The accuracy of the proposed methodology is 95% for chickpea recognition, 86% for lentils, and 60% for ervil. This methodology can be adapted to be applied in other crop combinations to improve the detection of abnormal plant vigour in intercropping agroecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available