Journal
ELECTRONICS
Volume 10, Issue 22, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10222785
Keywords
thermal management; electronics cooling; thermal energy storage; TES; duty cycle; phase change materials; PCM; cold finger technique; CFT
Categories
Funding
- Texas A&M Triads for Transformation (T3)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigates the real-time prediction of melt-fraction in thermal energy storage platforms using artificial neural networks. Training the ANN model with two different approaches can improve the efficiency and reliability of heat transfer systems.
Miniaturization of electronics devices is often limited by the concomitant high heat fluxes (cooling load) and maldistribution of temperature profiles (hot spots). Thermal energy storage (TES) platforms providing supplemental cooling can be a cost-effective solution, that often leverages phase change materials (PCM). Although salt hydrates provide higher storage capacities and power ratings (as compared to that of the organic PCMs), they suffer from reliability issues (e.g., supercooling). Cold Finger Technique (CFT) can obviate supercooling by maintaining a small mass fraction of the PCM in a solid state for enabling spontaneous nucleation. Optimization of CFT necessitates real-time forecasting of the transient values of the melt-fraction. In this study, the artificial neural network (ANN) is explored for real-time prediction of the time remaining to reach a target value of melt-fraction based on the prior history of the spatial distribution of the surface temperature transients. Two different approaches were explored for training the ANN model, using: (1) transient PCM-temperature data; or (2) transient surface-temperature data. When deployed in a heat sink that leverages PCM-based passive thermal management systems for cooling electronic chips and packages, this maverick approach (using the second method) affords cheaper costs, better sustainability, higher reliability, and resilience. The error in prediction varies during the melting process. During the final stages of the melting cycle, the errors in the predicted values are ~5% of the total time-scale of the PCM melting experiments.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available