4.6 Article

Single-Sensor EMI Source Localization Using Time Reversal: An Experimental Validation

Journal

ELECTRONICS
Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10192448

Keywords

electromagnetic time reversal; time-reversal cavity; electromagnetic interference source; source localization; electromagnetic compatibility

Funding

  1. EPFL ENABLE Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a novel localization technique based on the time-reversal cavity (TRC) concept for electromagnetic interference (EMI) sources, validates its effectiveness through experimentation, and verifies the time-reversal process through numerical simulations. The experimental setup involves a partially open cavity and two monopole antennas, achieving a small three-dimensional location error in the experimental validation.
The localization of electromagnetic interference (EMI) sources is of high importance in electromagnetic compatibility applications. Recently, a novel localization technique based on the time-reversal cavity (TRC) concept was proposed using only one sensor, and its application to localize EMI sources was validated numerically. In this paper, we present a validation of the proposed time-reversal process in which the forward step of the time-reversal process is performed experimentally and the backward step is carried out via numerical simulations, a realistic scenario which is applicable to practical source localization problems. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first implementation of a three-dimensional electromagnetic time-reversal process in which the forward signal is provided experimentally while the backward propagation step is carried out numerically. The considered experimental setup is formed by a partially open cavity and two monopole antennas to emulate the EMI source and the sensor (receiving antenna), respectively. Assuming that the location of the source is the feed point of the monopole antenna, the resulting three-dimensional location error in the experimental validation was only 1.49 cm, which is about one-third the length of the monopole antenna, corresponding to about lambda(min)/2 (diffraction limit).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available