4.7 Article

Designing a path for the sustainable development of key ecological function zones: A case study of southwest China

Journal

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
Volume 31, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01840

Keywords

Ecological security; Economic development; The coupling coordination degrees; Key ecological function zones

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Project of China [2016YFC0502106]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2018ZX07111002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the changes in ecological security, economic development, and coordination levels between key ecological function zones (KEFZs) and non-KEFZs in southwest China. It found that KEFZs exceeded non-KEFZs in ecological security, but lagged behind in economic development and coordination levels. The slow economic growth in KEFZs hindered the improvement of coordination between ecological security and economic development.
The Chinese government has designated areas with critically important ecosystems as key ecological function zones (KEFZs) under restrictive development regimes to maintain and improve their supplies of ecological products and services. A strategy of sustainable development is required for KEFZs in southwest China, given their fragile eco-environments, important ecofunctions, and lagging economies. This study aimed to identify and compare changes in ecological security, economic development, and the extent of their coordination in KEFZs and nonKEFZs in southwest China in 2010, 2015 and 2018 (i.e., before and after the policy of restricted development was introduced). The assessment systems of ecological security and economic development were constructed for assessing these areas. A coupling coordination degree (CCD) model was used to evaluate coordination levels between ecological security and economic development. Overall, the results indicated that the levels of ecological security in KEFZs were exceeded non-KEFZs. In 2010, KEFZs and non-KEFZs evidenced similar levels of economic development and CCDs. The economic development of KEFZs was lagging behind that of nonKEFZs after restrictive development regimes in KEFZs. The slow economic growth further hindered the improvement of the coordination between ecological security and economic development for KEFZs. The gaps between KEFZs and non-KEFZs regarding economic development and coordination levels were widening. The study provided some strategies for the sustainable development of southwest China's KEFZs, including the development of clean resources, the strategy of partial development and comprehensive environmental protection, the formulation of lists of allowed, restricted and prohibited industries, and effective utilization of ecological compensation policies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available