4.5 Article

Growth Equations in Forest Research: Mathematical Basis and Model Similarities

Journal

CURRENT FORESTRY REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 230-244

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40725-021-00145-8

Keywords

Differential equations; Growth-rates; von Bertalanffy; Logistic; Trees

Categories

Funding

  1. Chilean research grants Fondecyt [1191816]
  2. FONDEF [ID19|10421]
  3. ANID BASAL [FB210015]
  4. Academy of Finland Flagship Programme (UNITE) [337655]
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [337655] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the differences in mathematical properties and growth rate behaviors of various growth equations, suggesting the use of differential equations forms for better understanding. It emphasizes the importance of focusing on selecting a plausible equation for the organism being modeled, instead of overly relying on assumed biological basis. More attention should be given to parameter estimation strategies and behavior analysis of proposed models in forest research.
Purpose of Review Growth equations have been widely used in forest research, commonly to assess ecosystem-level behavior and forest management. Nevertheless, the large number of growth equations has obscured the growth-rate behavior of each of these equations and several different terms for referring to common phenomena. This review presents a unified mathematical treatment of growth-rates besides several well-known growth equations by giving their mathematical basis and representing their behavior using tree growth data as an example. Recent Findings We highlight the mathematical differences among several growth equations that can be better understood by using their differential equations forms rather than their integrated forms. Moreover, the assumed-and-claimed biological basis of these growth-rate models has been taken too seriously in forest research. The focus should be on using a plausible equation for the organism being modelled. We point out that more attention should be drawn to parameter estimation strategies and behavior analysis of the proposed models. Thus, it is difficult for a single model to capture all possible shapes and rates that such a complex biological process as tree growth can depict in nature. We pointed out misleading concepts attributed to some growth equations; however, the differences come from their mathematical properties rather than pure biological reasoning. Using the tree growth data, we depict those differences. Thus, comparisons of some functional forms (at least simple ones) must be carried out before selecting a function for drawing scientific findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available