4.7 Article

Antifungal and Antibiofilm Activity of Cyclic Temporin L Peptide Analogues against Albicans and Non-Albicans Candida Species

Journal

PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020454

Keywords

biofilm; temporin L; helical peptides; Candida strains; toxicity; Galleria mellonella

Funding

  1. Department of Pharmacy at the University of Naples Federico II
  2. Department of Pharmacy Federico II in the frame of the Department of Excellence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the antifungal and antibiofilm activities of a panel of cyclic temporin L isoform analogues and demonstrated significant activity for four peptides. Further investigation revealed that peptide 3, which demonstrated both non-toxicity and potent antibiofilm activity, holds promise for biomedical applications.
Temporins are one of the largest families of antimicrobial peptides with both anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activity. Herein, for a panel of cyclic temporin L isoform analogues, the antifungal and antibiofilm activities were determined against representative Candida strains, including C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. auris, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis. The outcomes indicated a significant anti-candida activity against planktonic and biofilm growth for four peptides (3, 7, 15 and 16). The absence of toxicity up to high concentrations and survival after infection were assessed in vivo by using Galleria mellonella larvae, and the correlation between conformation and cytotoxicity was investigated by fluorescence assays and circular dichroism (CD). By combining fluorescence spectroscopy, CD, dynamic light scattering, confocal and atomic force microscopy, the mode of action of four analogues was hypothesized. The results pinpointed that peptide 3 emerged as a non-toxic compound showing a potent antibiofilm activity and represents a promising compound for biomedical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available