4.6 Review

Gut Microbiota for Esophageal Cancer: Role in Carcinogenesis and Clinical Implications

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.717242

Keywords

microbiota; esophageal cancer; carcinogenesis; biomarker; therapeutic complication

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81970481]
  2. 1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University [2020HXFH047, 20HXJS005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Esophageal cancer patients exhibit changes in their microbiota composition, which can serve as biomarkers for screening and prognosis, as well as be adjusted to treat cancer and reduce treatment adverse effects. These findings have important implications for clinical applications utilizing gut microbiota.
Esophageal cancer (EC) is a common malignant tumor of the upper digestive tract. The microbiota in the digestive tract epithelium comprises a large number of microorganisms that adapt to the immune defense and interact with the host to form symbiotic networks, which affect many physiological processes such as metabolism, tissue development, and immune response. Reports indicate that there are microbial compositional changes in patients with EC, which provides an important opportunity to advance clinical applications based on findings on the gut microbiota. For example, microbiota detection can be used as a biomarker for screening and prognosis, and microorganism levels can be adjusted to treat cancer and decrease the adverse effects of treatment. This review aims to provide an outline of the gut microbiota in esophageal neoplasia, including the mechanisms involved in microbiota-related carcinogenesis and the prospect of utilizing the microbiota as EC biomarkers and treatment targets. These findings have important implications for translating the use of gut microbiota in clinical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available