4.6 Article

Laparoscopic Versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study in China

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.780398

Keywords

advanced gastric cancer; laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer; open total gastrectomy; multicenter cohort study; propensity score (PS) matching (PSM)

Categories

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Plan of Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China [202102080230]
  2. Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [A2020019]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2020A1515010573]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This multicenter cohort study compared the surgical and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) and open total gastrectomy (OTG) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients. The study found that LTG was not inferior to OTG in terms of survival outcomes, and LTG was associated with fewer postoperative complications and shorter hospitalization time.
BackgroundGiven the great technical difficulty and procedural complexity of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG), the technical and oncologic safety of LTG versus open total gastrectomy (OTG) in the field of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is yet undetermined. ObjectiveThis multicenter cohort study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of LTG with those of OTG in AGC patients. Patients and MethodsIn total, 588 patients from 3 centers who underwent primary total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, by well-trained surgeons with adequate experience, for pathologically confirmed locally AGC (T2N0-3, T3N0-3, or T4N0-3) between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2015, were identified, and their clinical data were collected from three participating centers. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 450 cases (LTG, n = 225; OTG, n = 225) were eligible and assessed. ResultsNo significant difference in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates, or 5-year overall survival (OS) rates between both surgical groups were observed. Although LTG had significantly longer surgical time (262 vs. 180 min, p < 0.001), LTG was associated with fewer postoperative complications [relative risk (RR) 0.583, 95% CI 0.353-0.960, p = 0.047), less intraoperative bleeding (120 vs. 200 ml, p < 0.001), longer proximal margin resection (3 vs. 2 cm, p < 0.001), and shorter postoperative hospitalization (11 vs. 13 days, p < 0.001). The mortality rate was comparable in both groups. ConclusionsLTG was not inferior to OTG in terms of survival outcomes and was associated with shorter surgical and postoperative hospitalization time and fewer postoperative complications, suggesting LTG with D2 lymphadenectomy as an important alternative to OTG for patients with AGC, but to be carried out in highly experienced centers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available