4.6 Review

Patient-Derived Explants as a Precision Medicine Patient-Proximal Testing Platform Informing Cancer Management

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.767697

Keywords

precision medicine; patient-derived explants; whole exome sequencing; ex vivo; cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. Princess Alexandra Research Foundation
  2. Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) Rapid Applied Research Translation Program (Centre for Personalised Analysis of Cancers (CPAC) [GA59729]
  3. 2018 Priority-driven Collaborative Cancer Research Scheme [1159637]
  4. Cancer Australia
  5. Leukemia Foundation of Australia
  6. Australian Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the use of patient-derived explants (PDEs) in cancer treatment, revealing their limited longevity which may not be suitable for integrating personalized treatment options. Therefore, improving the longevity of PDEs is crucial to enhance the feasibility and effectiveness of personalized therapies.
Precision medicine approaches that inform clinical management of individuals with cancer are progressively advancing. Patient-derived explants (PDEs) provide a patient-proximal ex vivo platform that can be used to assess sensitivity to standard of care (SOC) therapies and novel agents. PDEs have several advantages as a patient-proximal model compared to current preclinical models, as they maintain the phenotype and microenvironment of the individual tumor. However, the longevity of PDEs is not compatible with the timeframe required to incorporate candidate therapeutic options identified by whole exome sequencing (WES) of the patient's tumor. This review investigates how PDE longevity varies across tumor streams and how this is influenced by tissue preparation. Improving longevity of PDEs will enable individualized therapeutics testing, and thus contribute to improving outcomes for people with cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available