4.6 Review

Impact of Tumor-Stroma Ratio on the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.738080

Keywords

tumor-stroma ratio; colorectal cancer; meta-analysis; stroma content; prognosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Huzhou Science and Technology Plan [2020GYT09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) is a promising prognostic indicator for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, with low TSR associated with worse prognosis in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The study found significantly higher hazard ratios for patients with low TSR in stage II CRC, stage III CRC, and mixed stage CRC, suggesting a predictive relevance for poor outcomes in these patients.
Background: It is critical to develop a reliable and cost-effective prognostic tool for colorectal cancer (CRC) stratification and treatment optimization. Tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) may be a promising indicator of poor prognosis in CRC patients. As a result, we conducted a systematic review on the predictive value of TSR in CRC.Methods: This study was carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline. An electronic search was completed using commonly used databases PubMed, CENTRAL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google scholar till the last search up to May 30, 2021. STATA version 13 was used to analyze the data.Results: A total of 13 studies [(12 for disease-free survival (DFS) and nine studies for overall survival (OS)] involving 4,857 patients met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review in the present study. In individuals with stage II CRC, stage III CRC, or mixed stage CRC, we observed a significantly higher pooled hazard ratio (HR) in those with a low TSR/greater stromal content (HR, 1.54; 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.88), (HR, 1.90; 95% CI: 1.35 to 2.45), and (HR, 1.70; 95% CI: 1.45 to 1.95), respectively, for predicting DFS. We found that a low TSR ratio had a statistically significant predictive relevance for stage II (HR, 1.43; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.77) and mixed stages of CRC (HR, 1.65; 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.0) for outcome OS.Conclusion: In patients with CRC, low TSR was found to be a prognostic factor for a worse prognosis (DFS and OS).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available