4.6 Article

Current Methods and Pipelines for Image-Based Quantitation of Nuclear Shape and Nuclear Envelope Abnormalities

Journal

CELLS
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells11030347

Keywords

nuclear envelope; nuclear envelope abnormality; lamina; nuclear morphology

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nuclear morphology abnormalities have significant impact on cellular functioning and genomic integrity, making quantitative measurement of nuclear shape crucial. This article provides an overview of various nuclear abnormalities and reviews current image-based quantification methods. New pipelines for quantitative analysis of nuclear shape are also introduced. Quantitative analyses of nuclear aberrations and shape have wide applications in assessing cancer cell anomalies and studying nucleus deformability under stress.
Any given cell type has an associated normal nuclear morphology, which is important to maintain proper cellular functioning and safeguard genomic integrity. Deviations from this can be indicative of diseases such as cancer or premature aging syndrome. To accurately assess nuclear abnormalities, it is important to use quantitative measures of nuclear morphology. Here, we give an overview of several nuclear abnormalities, including micronuclei, nuclear envelope invaginations, blebs and ruptures, and review the current methods used for image-based quantification of these abnormalities. We discuss several parameters that can be used to quantify nuclear shape and compare their outputs using example images. In addition, we present new pipelines for quantitative analysis of nuclear blebs and invaginations. Quantitative analyses of nuclear aberrations and shape will be important in a wide range of applications, from assessments of cancer cell anomalies to studies of nucleus deformability under mechanical or other types of stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available