4.6 Review

Electrophysiological Consequences of Cardiac Fibrosis

Journal

CELLS
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10113220

Keywords

fibrosis; conduction; arrhythmias; tissue structure; heart

Categories

Funding

  1. Netherlands Heart Foundation [CVON2014-09]
  2. European Union [860974, 633196, 965286, 952166]
  3. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [860974] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fibrosis is recognized as a key determinant of conduction disturbances in both atria and ventricles, with different forms such as replacement, endomysial, perimysial, perivascular, endocardial, and epicardial fibrosis. The impact on conduction depends on how the patterns of electrical connections between myocytes are altered. Evaluating cardiac fibrosis should exclude fibrous tissue that does not affect conduction and differentiate between different types.
For both the atria and ventricles, fibrosis is generally recognized as one of the key determinants of conduction disturbances. By definition, fibrosis refers to an increased amount of fibrous tissue. However, fibrosis is not a singular entity. Various forms can be distinguished, that differ in distribution: replacement fibrosis, endomysial and perimysial fibrosis, and perivascular, endocardial, and epicardial fibrosis. These different forms typically result from diverging pathophysiological mechanisms and can have different consequences for conduction. The impact of fibrosis on propagation depends on exactly how the patterns of electrical connections between myocytes are altered. We will therefore first consider the normal patterns of electrical connections and their regional diversity as determinants of propagation. Subsequently, we will summarize current knowledge on how different forms of fibrosis lead to a loss of electrical connectivity in order to explain their effects on propagation and mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis, including ectopy, reentry, and alternans. Finally, we will discuss a histological quantification of fibrosis. Because of the different forms of fibrosis and their diverging effects on electrical propagation, the total amount of fibrosis is a poor indicator for the effect on conduction. Ideally, an assessment of cardiac fibrosis should exclude fibrous tissue that does not affect conduction and differentiate between the various types that do; in this article, we highlight practical solutions for histological analysis that meet these requirements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available