4.6 Review

Interaction between Non-Coding RNAs and Androgen Receptor with an Especial Focus on Prostate Cancer

Journal

CELLS
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10113198

Keywords

androgen receptor; miRNA; lncRNA; circular RNAs; prostate cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. friedrich schiller university jena

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The androgen receptor (AR) has multiple functional domains that can affect the pathogenesis of human malignancies, especially prostate cancer, through genomic and non-genomic activities. The interactions between non-coding RNAs and AR play a crucial role in designing novel treatment options and modulating response to conventional therapeutics.
The androgen receptor (AR) is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily and has three functional domains, namely the N-terminal, DNA binding, and C-terminal domain. The N-terminal domain harbors potent transactivation functions, whereas the C-terminal domain binds to androgens and antiandrogens used to treat prostate cancer. AR has genomic activity being DNA binding-dependent or through interaction with other DNA-bound transcription factors, as well as a number of non-genomic, non-canonical functions, such as the activation of the ERK, AKT, and MAPK pathways. A bulk of evidence indicates that non-coding RNAs have functional interactions with AR. This type of interaction is implicated in the pathogenesis of human malignancies, particularly prostate cancer. In the current review, we summarize the available data on the role of microRNAs, long non-coding RNAs, and circular RNAs on the expression of AR and modulation of AR signaling, as well as the effects of AR on their expression. Recognition of the complicated interaction between non-coding RNAs and AR has practical importance in the design of novel treatment options, as well as modulation of response to conventional therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available