4.6 Review

Tutorial: Guidelines for Single-Cell RT-qPCR

Journal

CELLS
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10102607

Keywords

single cell; sample collection; reverse transcription; preamplification; quantitative PCR; gene expression; RT-qPCR

Categories

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation (GACR) [GACR 19-02046S, GACR 20-05770S]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109, RVO 86652036]
  3. European Union [825575]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is a valuable tool for understanding gene expression, particularly in single-cell analysis. This article discusses the limitations of single-cell collection methods, emphasizes the importance of reverse transcription, provides recommendations for preamplification and primer design, and summarizes essential data processing steps. The detailed protocol in the appendix allows any researcher to conduct high-standard scRT-qPCR measurements.
Reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) has delivered significant insights in understanding the gene expression landscape. Thanks to its precision, sensitivity, flexibility, and cost effectiveness, RT-qPCR has also found utility in advanced single-cell analysis. Single-cell RT-qPCR now represents a well-established method, suitable for an efficient screening prior to single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) experiments, or, oppositely, for validation of hypotheses formulated from high-throughput approaches. Here, we aim to provide a comprehensive summary of the scRT-qPCR method by discussing the limitations of single-cell collection methods, describing the importance of reverse transcription, providing recommendations for the preamplification and primer design, and summarizing essential data processing steps. With the detailed protocol attached in the appendix, this tutorial provides a set of guidelines that allow any researcher to perform scRT-qPCR measurements of the highest standard.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available