4.6 Article

Workup and Clinical Assessment for Allergen Immunotherapy Candidates

Journal

CELLS
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells11040653

Keywords

allergen immunotherapy; venom immunotherapy; contraindications; allergy diagnosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) is an effective and safe treatment for respiratory and insect-venom allergies. However, not all patients are eligible for this treatment. Allergists often face clinical, ethical, and legal issues when deciding whether to order extensive workup for apparently healthy AIT candidates. This article suggests an approach to evaluate the presence of any underlying diseases/conditions in patients with no case history before starting AIT.
Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) is a well-established, efficient, and safe way to treat respiratory and insect-venom allergies. After determining the diagnosis of the clinically relevant culprit allergen, AIT can be prescribed. However, not all patients are eligible for AIT, since some diseases/conditions represent contraindications to AIT use, as described in several guidelines. Allergists are often preoccupied on whether an extensive workup should be ordered in apparently healthy AIT candidates in order to detect contra-indicated diseases and conditions. These preoccupations often arise from clinical, ethical and legal issues. The aim of this article is to suggest an approach to the workup and assessment of the presence of any underlying diseases/conditions in patients with no case history before the start of AIT. Notably, there is a lack of published studies on the appropriate evaluation of AIT candidates, with no globally accepted guidelines. It appears that Allergists are mostly deciding based on their AIT training, as well as their clinical experience. Guidance is based mainly on experts' opinions; the suggested preliminary workup can be divided into mandatory and optional testing. The evaluation for possible underlying neoplastic, autoimmune, and cardiovascular diseases, primary and acquired immunodeficiencies and pregnancy, might be helpful but only in subjects for whom the history and clinical examination raise suspicion of these conditions. A workup without any reasonable correlation with potential contraindications is useless. In conclusion, the evaluation of each individual candidate for possible medical conditions should be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available