4.6 Article

Surgical Margins Status and Prognosis after Resection of Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results from a Taiwanese Nationwide Registry-Based Study

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010015

Keywords

oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma; surgical margin; outcome; local control; nationwide registry study

Categories

Funding

  1. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Linkou) [CMRPD1H0521, CMRPG3I0011, CMRPG3I0012, CMRPG3I0013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study addressed the controversy regarding the optimal cutoff values for surgical margins in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. The findings suggest that a margin status >4 mm can be considered as adequate.
Simple Summary While the prognostic role of surgical margins in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma is well-established, the optimal cutoff values for margin status remain controversial. This study addressed this issue in a large sample of 13,768 patients included in a nationwide registry in Taiwan. The identification of the most suitable cutoff value for surgical margins was conducted using 5-year local control as the outcome of interest. On analyzing the margin status-categorized as 0, 0.1-4 and > 4 mm-the 5-year outcomes were as follows: local control, 87, 89 and 92%; disease-specific survival, 57, 76 and 81%; overall survival, 47, 67 and 74%, respectively. Collectively, these data indicate that a margin status >4 mm can be considered as adequate. (1) Background: The optimal cutoff value that maximizes the prognostic value of surgical margins in patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma has not yet been identified. (2) Methods: Data for this study were retrieved from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database. A total of 13,768 Taiwanese patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma were identified and stratified according to different margin statuses (0, 0.1-4 and > 4 mm). The five-year local control, disease-specific survival and overall survival rates were the main outcome measures. (3) Results: The 5-year local control, disease-specific survival and overall survival rates of patients with close margins (0 and 0.1-4 mm) were significantly lower than those observed in patients with clear margins (> 4 mm; all p values < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, margin status, depth of invasion and extra-nodal extension were identified as independent adverse prognostic factors for 5-year local control. (4) Conclusions: A thorough assessment of surgical margins can provide a reliable prognostic prediction in patients with OCSCC. This has potential implications for treatment approaches tailored to the individual level. The achievement of clear margins (>4 mm) should be considered a key surgical goal to improve outcomes in this patient group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available