Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Oncological and functional outcomes in patients over 70 years of age treated with robotic radical prostatectomy: a propensity-matched analysis
Pratik M. S. Gurung et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2021)
Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer
Joel E. Rosenberg et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2021)
Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
Hyuna Sung et al.
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2021)
Predictive Factors for Positive Surgical Margins in Patients With Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lijin Zhang et al.
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY (2021)
Primary Gleason grade and Gleason grade group at positive surgical margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Athul John et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2021)
Impact of Nerve-Sparing Status on Positive Surgical Margin Location and Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with Prostate Cancer Post Radical Prostatectomy
Yoshinori Matsuda et al.
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2021)
Functional and Oncological Outcomes After Open Versus Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer: 8-Year Follow-up
Anna Lantz et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2021)
Tumor Biological Feature and Its Association with Positive Surgical Margins and Apical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy in Non-Metastasis Prostate Cancer
Shuo Wang et al.
CURRENT ONCOLOGY (2021)
Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer
Alberto Martini et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY (2021)
The impact of surgical margin status on prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
B. Zhang et al.
CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY (2020)
Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy improves early recovery of urinary continence: a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial with a 1-year follow-up
Xuefeng Qiu et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2020)
Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center
Antonio Benito Porcaro et al.
JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY (2020)
Risk factors of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-volume center: results in 732 cases
Antonio Benito Porcaro et al.
JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY (2020)
Extent of positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy: impact on biochemical recurrence with long-term follow-up
Yoann Koskas et al.
BMC UROLOGY (2019)
Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer
Felix Preisser et al.
PROSTATE (2019)
High surgeon volume and positive surgical margins can predict the risk of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Antonio Benito Porcaro et al.
THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY (2019)
Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases
James E. Thompson et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2018)
Clinical implications of PTEN loss in prostate cancer
Tamara Jamaspishvili et al.
NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY (2018)
Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies
Lijin Zhang et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2018)
Robotic vs. Retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and an meta-analysis update
Kun Tang et al.
ONCOTARGET (2017)
Recent Changes in Prostate Cancer Screening Practices and Epidemiology
Daniel J. Lee et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2017)
Assessing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
Thomas Seisen et al.
LANCET (2017)
Correlation between postoperative prostate-specific antigen and biochemical recurrence in positive surgical margin patients: Single surgeon series
Won Ik Seo et al.
PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL (2017)
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System
Jonathan I. Epstein et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2016)
Prognostic Value of Focal Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy
Sangchul Lee et al.
CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER (2016)
Randomized Phase III Noninferiority Study Comparing Two Radiotherapy Fractionation Schedules in Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
W. Robert Lee et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2016)
Importance of Reporting the Gleason Score at the Positive Surgical Margin Site: Analysis of 4,082 Consecutive Radical Prostatectomy Cases
Max Kates et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2016)
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study
John W. Yaxley et al.
LANCET (2016)
Association of Anterior and Lateral Extraprostatic Extensions with Base-Positive Resection Margins in Prostate Cancer
Yong Jin Kang et al.
PLOS ONE (2016)
The effect of wide resection during radical prostatectomy on surgical margins
Luke T. Lavallee et al.
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL (2016)
Should Gleason 6 be labeled as cancer?
Ibrahim Kulac et al.
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY (2015)
The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years
Prasanna Sooriakumaran et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2015)
Positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with pT2 and pT3a disease could be considered pathological upstaging
Adil Ouzzane et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2014)
Primary Gleason Grade 4 at the Positive Margin Is Associated with Metastasis and Death Among Patients with Gleason 7 Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
Boyd R. Viers et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2014)
The Prevalence of Persistent Prostate Cancer after Radiotherapy Detected at Radical Cystoprostatectomy for Bladder Cancer
Joshua J. Meeks et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2014)
Significance and management of positive surgical margins at the time of radical prostatectomy
Jonathan L. Silberstein et al.
INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2014)
Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery
Nazareno Suardi et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2013)
Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer
Jong Jin Oh et al.
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS (2013)
Radical prostatectomy: Positive surgical margins matter
Joshua J. Meeks et al.
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS (2013)
High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy
Richard Savdie et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2012)
Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality
Heather J. Chalfin et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2012)
Pre-treatment risk stratification of prostate cancer patients: A critical review
George Rodrigues et al.
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL (2012)
Cancer Control and Functional Outcomes of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Radiation-recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Daher C. Chade et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2012)
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naive patients
Guillaume Ploussard et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2011)
Detection of ERG gene rearrangements and PTEN deletions in unsuspected prostate cancer of the transition zone
Shuhong Liu et al.
CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY (2011)
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume
Theo H. van der Kwast et al.
MODERN PATHOLOGY (2011)
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease
Cristina Magi-Galluzzi et al.
MODERN PATHOLOGY (2011)
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling
Hemamali Samaratunga et al.
MODERN PATHOLOGY (2011)
The Gleason Score of Tumor at the Margin in Radical Prostatectomy is Predictive of Biochemical Recurrence
Dengfeng Cao et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2010)
Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy Differs by Disease Risk Group
Sultan Alkhateeb et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2010)
Focal Positive Surgical Margins Decrease Disease-free Survival After Radical Prostatectomy Even in Organ-confined Disease
Alison M. Lake et al.
UROLOGY (2010)
Factors affecting erectile function after radical retropubic prostatectomy: results from 1620 consecutive patients
Rajinikanth Ayyathurai et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2008)
Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy
J. Kellogg Parsons et al.
UROLOGY (2008)
Identification of patients with prostate cancer who benefit from immediate postoperative radiotherapy:: EORTC 22911
Theodorus H. Van der Kwast et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2007)
The clinical features of anterior prostate cancers
Theresa M. Koppie et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2006)
Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens
P Swindle et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2005)
Closest distance between tumor and resection margin in radical prostatectomy specimens - Lack of prognostic significance
RE Emerson et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2005)
Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer
JE Johansson et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2004)
Share Paper
