4.7 Review

Risk Factors for Perioperative Hemodynamic Instability in Pheochromocytoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10194531

Keywords

pheochromocytoma; adrenalectomy; hemodynamic instability; hypertension; hypotension

Funding

  1. Suzuki Urologic Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through systematic search and meta-analysis, this study identified tumor size and urinary norepinephrine as important predictors and risk factors for perioperative hemodynamic instability in pheochromocytoma patients undergoing adrenalectomy.
Objective: To evaluate the risk factors of perioperative hemodynamic instability in pheochromocytoma, we conducted a systematic search of the literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. Methods: In April 2021, we systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane library, and Scopus for relevant studies on the risk factors of perioperative hemodynamic instability of adrenalectomy in patients with pheochromocytoma, and we subjected the findings from those studies to formal meta-analysis. Results: Our systematic review identified 14 studies involving 1725 patients, of which nine studies with 967 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that tumor size (odds ratio (OR): 1.14 for each increased cm, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.26, z = 2.57) and urinary norepinephrine (OR, 1.51: 95% CI 1.26-1.81; z = 4.50) were most closely associated with the occurrence of perioperative hemodynamic instability. Conclusion: These findings suggest that tumor size and urinary norepinephrine are important predictors and risk factors for perioperative hemodynamic instability in adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. Such findings may be of value to surgeons and anesthesiologists when considering or preparing for this procedure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available