4.7 Article

High miR-511-3p Expression as a Potential Predictor of a Poor Nutritional Status in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Subjected to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030805

Keywords

head and neck cancer; cancer cachexia; malnutrition; radiotherapy; IMRT; miR-511-3p

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A correlation was found between the expression of miR-511-3p and nutritional status in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Higher expression of miR-511-3p was observed in well-nourished patients compared to those with malnutrition. This suggests that miR-511-3p could serve as a potential biomarker for nutritional deficiencies in this patient population.
Nutritional deficiencies, including malnutrition and its irreversible type cachexia, are often observed in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Among the various factors contributing to the occurrence of these disorders, inflammation seems to be crucial. The potential regulatory properties of miR-511-3p, e.g., post-translational alteration of expression of genes with protein products that are involved in inflammation, may be related to nutritional deficiencies observed in HNC patients. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess the correlation between pretreatment miR-511-3p expression and nutritional status in patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) due to HNC. In our retrospective study, 60 consecutively admitted patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) due to advanced HNC were enrolled. The analysis of miR-511-3p expression was performed using real-time PCR. Significantly higher expression of miR-511-3p was observed in well-nourished patients compared to patients with moderate or severe malnutrition (p = 0.0001). Pretreatment expression of miR-511-3p may be a useful biomarker of nutritional deficiencies in patients subjected to IMRT due to HNC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available