4.7 Article

Age-Specific Normative Values of Lumbar Spine Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) in Taiwanese Men and Women

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204740

Keywords

bone density; trabecular bone score; normative values; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Funding

  1. TCMMP [109-03-03(110)]
  2. Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to estimate age-specific, normative TBS curves for Taiwanese men and women. Findings revealed that TBS declined at different rates across age groups in women, while it declined at a constant rate in men.
Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a novel method for assessing trabecular microarchitecture. Normative values of TBS are available for various populations of the world but are not yet available for Taiwanese adults. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to estimate age-specific, normative TBS curves for Taiwanese men and women. Medical records of general health examinations from a regional hospital in Southern Taiwan were reviewed. Individuals aged 30-90 years with data on lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) were included. TBS was retrospectively calculated from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans using TBS iNsight software. Of the 12,028 patients included, 4533 (37.7%) were male and the mean age was 55.8 years. The mean TBS was 1.392 (standard deviation (SD) 0.089) for men and 1.344 (SD 0.107) for women. In women, TBS declined at a rate of 0.0004/year among those aged 30.0-45.9 years, 0.0106/year among those 46.0-60.7 years, and 0.0028/year among those 60.8-90.0 years. In men, TBS declined at a constant rate of 0.0023/year over the entire age range. In conclusion, age-adjusted, normative curves of TBS for Taiwanese men and women are presented, which could be used to facilitate the use of TBS in assessing bone status in clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available